Culhane v St Joseph's College [1995] ICQ 10 (1995) 149 QGIG 709
7 D V R ME r D TR I AZ TT I. O Jun e, 1995 30 June , I 5] L DGO R
Ql ' I Ii\ . I \ I) I. Ill .: I Rl/\1 tot 11{ I
/11d11Hr,al Rc/11r1<Jfl I ff) I/
, 1181_) - a1 pent li-0111 ck,1, 1011 ol'indu. 1n, 1I cummh ·, on
l!ar~ C11ll1Jn,
,\ f)
II, Jun.: IN:;
, \p p,.,11 - D • •~ion 111 lnJu. In.ii ( 1 mm1, 11,11 I rror of I .111 <>1
I·, .. .: , or \\ mt o lunsd1 uon Oppt rtt n11~ tn , r•• u • L ,u
( 11,1. l1m d1,·1io 1 11, ,\\\ard Co t:,, ., D1 r,·110 11a1 .1 - !'1.(1 Ord ·r ,h
It ( , , ,
JI D<, II 'T
I '•• .:pphc,mt'~ 1c111;1,111.:111c111111 the po~iti .. n nl t.::ad1c1· hhr,11 I J. n
JI t11J•· ·.- I ulkg • \\,1, or<lcrc<l t,, m tnd11 Lrial l 1•11u 1 ~a•n,r ,!lid
t 1< mplo~cr apre,11 .iga111,1 rh;ll e~1'11m 1111, di,,1111:,,,cd ,,n c,
T lN U TRlAL GAZ IT 70
I),: c::mbcr 199~ Th· rpcal 10 du c •un la} lln undi 111 ,
luw or ..:,i:e s or \\ant ntjuri, J1 11011 unct on no other ro unJ \ hen
th • appc,1I "<I!> J1 111i~,,;d . I c pre ed lhe , IC \\ ha 1h1:r houkt ,.
no ord ·r a. 10 .:, • ~ The pre nt pm~ ·.:din!! , nrc to t? l"C the
~ppcll 111 an nrrortun iry 10 arg ue the issue u f co~L\ J it ,1 u~ not
.ir~u :JI dcrnil a the h aring of the .ipp.! I
lnGu/dm,111\· lol(l(;e ,1 NulJltl•l1tl( 19 9'J 14 (.)GIG .r .the
\ mm,, 11111· :.ts an.il:,,,ed \l r mc::rcnJ tor th ·
appcllunt di th,11 1 i • 11 , 11 h n1i111.:d
that 11 ,, m pi~ 1h pri ,:,, \\hc::rc n
cm l11)cr, Im, . I . fu c I ag1111w
rh c (on u ni in Lili, Coun tcJ that th
uld folio,, th , • plJ
I h Jun~, tum to J\1 .ird I is 1. d1 • n:111 lldl) ut u h
cl" r c:1 1 11 mu,1 not he c~ ·r 1scd mhitrnril . Be au c 11 1 a
db rcll naT) c,cr I c c h ca~e mu,1 h<.· lnOucn ed h ill wn
pan11.ular .i b h mu I I 1 \lg.h t of that the
r m tatcment JUrisdic1 io n i cs , cnt1a ll inthrt rla l in na t ur~ . II i~
probahlJ 1m iblc nJ ert inl) frJught \\lth ,m ulh to d ·fine
the iod nf a e 11hcr c p:in,cul r r . ult 11 ill follem. It rnu~t .11. o
he kep i in mind that th e grounJ f appeal arc l1 mi 1c d and Jo not
ordmaril~ alto" re, 1~\\ lhc mcnt o t he d • 1 ion
n the ab,cncc
f I'll: ·ial c1rcum t.m cs jmllf) ,n g :-t m' other o rd er •~ I ~, innc 1b l,:
111 11 har rcm:.1111,; C$:c nt 11IIJ an indu tn,tl pr cecdin •. Thc r..: \1 ill no
d1>ub1 be 1e.i.,c "h re II o.11 pn ~rh be I 1mcJ that un ,u " ul
11 pp .ii 1,hcth i.: r h~ an cmp lu ycr or an rn 1plo 1c,; shou ld artra ·t an
.id, CT\ • orJ.r a I cc ,1 . but ha, mg g11 en the qu u n
un~11kr,1til 11 ,II !111: um ol the , Tl((lllOI appeal and a am lu the mo re
dc ,ta1h.:J ,ubmi< ion. m thc,c pr eel.ling I .ui1 l th \ ic , th ul the
11tdcr th t I ere . hould he no onlcr m ,,,, " ,1ppr pr1at · i llm
«1'c . I ordL·r tha r th e re he nt nrch:r D~ 10 c1Ns
l>J tcd 1!11, :;1 lcc·nth Ja~ of June. 199.
t--. .(, \\ 1A '·L· ' Ill ., Prc .,1J ·n l
\1 r /\ llcr bc1 1. fo r ~l .l oscph ', Coll•gc.
\lr 1\ . , \mcn:11~. ru ll ;irr, ( ulhJllC
OpCIJIII<.: J ,1lc \ ' i\
luJ •1 1,;1U - IIJ (. 11lhJnc .iniJ I lu,crh·, Colle •e
ll##f/llll/l# /f#/I/U#l#/11/1(1 lf#/111 /1 1#/ll##ll##// lllf##ll#ll#/l###ll/:J##l/###fl
-- 1 of 1 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/ICQ/1995/010