Amos v GIO General Ltd [1994] QCA 452
1
[1994]QCA 452
COURT OF APPEAL
FITZGERALD P
DERRINGTON J
CULLINANE J
Appeal No 181 of 1994
EDWARD AMOS Appellant
and
GIO GENERAL LTD Respondent
BRISBANE
..DATE 04/10/94
JUDGMENT
-- 1 of 3 --
041094 T 12/MJR M/T COA94/302
JUDGMENT
2
THE PRESIDENT: It is not proposed to discuss the facts of
this matter in detail. They are well known to the parties.
The case for the applicant for leave to appeal has been put on
a variety of bases, firstly in the pleadings in the
Magistrates Court; then in the notice of appeal to the
District Court and the amendments firstly proposed and
secondly allowed to that notice of appeal; in the affidavit in
support of the present application for leave to appeal to this
Court sworn by the solicitor for the applicant and finally in
counsel's argument to this Court.
The submission ultimately made is that there is an important
question of law involved in the Magistrate's finding that
there was no concluded contract between the parties.
Alternatively it was submitted that there is an important
point of justice involved in that the District Court allowed
amendments to the applicant's notice of appeal to that Court
which it is said effectively denied the applicant the
opportunity fully to argue its case or permitted the summary
determination of the appeal to that Court against the
applicant.
On analysis in my opinion all points ultimately depend upon
the finding by the Magistrate that there was no concluded
contract between the parties. That is a finding which was
based upon the particular circumstances of this case and
-- 2 of 3 --
041094 T 12/MJR M/T COA94/302
JUDGMENT
3
involved no unusual, difficult, or otherwise important
question of law.
In the circumstances I am satisfied that no basis for leave to
appeal has been made out and I would refuse the application.
DERRINGTON J: I agree.
CULLINANE J: I agree.
THE PRESIDENT: The application is refused.
Anything to say about costs?
MR LENNON: No, Your Honour.
THE PRESIDENT: The appellant must pay the respondent's costs
to be taxed.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/1994/452