Courtney & Ors v Walz Construction Co Pty Ltd [1994] QSC 285
se ~4(d-85
State Reporting Bureau
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
(Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold
without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.)
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
DEMACK J
No 86 of 1992
NOELENE COURTNEY
and
TINA MAREE COURTNEY
and
NICOLA SUE COURTNEY
(an infant suing by her
next friend NOELENE COURTNEY)
and
ARTHUR COURTNEY
(an infant suing by his
next friend NOELENE COURTNEY)
and
WALZ CONSTRUCTION CO PTY LTD
ROCKHAMPTON
.. DATE 07/09/94
1
REVISED COPIES ISSUED
State Reporting Bureau
Date 7 I
First flaintiff
Second Plaintiff
Third Plaintiff
Fourth Plaint~ff
Defendant
4111 I·1oor, J'/JL' l.a11 Courts, Gcor~c Street, /Jri~;b:lllt', Q. 4000 Tt:lcplwnc: (07) 227 4360. J.:Jcsimile: (07) 227 5532
-- 1 of 2 --
070994 (Demack J)
HIS HONOUR: This is an application brought on behalf of the
fourth plaintiff for the sanctioning of a proposed compromise
of his claim. The fourth plaintiff is the son of the deceased
man and at the time of his father's death he was a little over
13 years of age.
There is no suggestion that Arthur would have gone on to any
tertiary study, so that the period of dependency is fairly
limited to 18 years of age. The value of the dependency is
estimated at about $100 a week which seems to be within the
capacity of the deceased man. Over a period then of about
five years the sum of $37,500 is a reasonable compromise of
the fourth plaintiff's claim.
I am satisfied then that orders should be made in terms of the
draft that has been prepared. The order will be in terms of
the draft, initialled by me and placed with the papers.
In respect of the actions of the first, second and third
plaintiffs, I order by consent that their actions be adjourned
to the settlement list and further by consent that the
defe..Ddant pay ·the costs of the t'irst, second and third~
plaintiffs of and incidental to the action to be taxed.
ORDER
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/1994/285