Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union, Queensland Branch, Union of Employees v Queensland Confederation of Industry Limited, Union of Employees [1994] QIRC 439 (1994) 146 QGIG 964
964 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT IND US TRIAL GAZETTE [ 19 August, 1994
###1#/##################################################
QUEENSLAND IND USTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Industrial Relations Act I 990
s. 14 7 - app li cat ion for variation
Austra li an Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union.
Queens land Bra nch. Un ion of Emp loyees
AND
Queensland Confederation of Industry Limited,
Union of Employees
(.'l'o R/ 71-3 of l989and 8650of/993)
EMPLOYEES- COOK FREEZE PTY . LTD .
l!\Dl:STRIAL AGREB1E!\T
COMMISS IONER EDWARDS
14 March 1994
VARIATION
19August , 1994] QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 965
T HIS matter coming on for heari ng before the Commission at
Brisbane on 14 March 1994, this Comm ission doth order that the
said Industrial Agreement be varied as follows as from the litteenth
day of March, 1994:-
I. By de leting subclauses (3) to (12) inclusive of clau se 3
(Definitions) and inserting the following in lieu thereof:-
"(3 )'E mployee Leve l I' - (82%) shall mean an emp loyee with
no previous relevant experience . An employee at this level sh all be
employed for the purpose of induction and training for a period of up
to three months duration.
Such an employee performs routine duties essentia ll y of a
manual nature to the level of their training and exercises minimal
judgement working under direct supervision.
(4) 'Emp loyee Level 2' - (87.4%) shall mean an employee
either having relevant experience or having successfully completed
induction training at Level I. Such an employee exercises s kill to
the level of their training in addition to that required of a Level I
Employee.
An emp loyee at this level shall possess bas ic numeracy and
literacy skills.
Indicative duties of an emp loyee at this level would i nclude:-
- Operation of minor equipment and/ or the operation of major
equipment for cleani ng purposes;
Routine manua l handli ng ;
Recording simple data;
- Maintains records.
(5) · Emp loyee Level 3B ' - (90%) s hall mean an employee
having the abi lity to operate one or more ·major processing
machines ' as defined herein. Such an emp loyee exercises skill to the
level of lheir training in addilion to lhat required of a Le ve l 2
employee.
(6) ·Employee Level 3A ' - (92.4% ) shall mean an emp loyee
having the ability to perform mathematical calculations on data
recorded and to interpret data . Such an emp loyee exerci ses s kil l to
the leve l of their training in addition to that required of a Level 2
emp loyee.
Indicative tasks of an employee at this le vel wou ld include the
use o f bat i;h shecls. picking s lips and re qui siti ons and to act upon
infom1ation gathered in the interpretation of data.
(7 ) ·Employee Lev el 4' - (96%) shall mean an employee
having undergone training and required to perform the duties
associated with both Level 38 and 3A employees.
( 8) 'Em ployee Level 5' - ( I 00%) shall mean an employee
requi red to perform du ties associated with the supervision, tra ining
and co-ordination of work of emp loyee at the various leve ls . A
Leve l 5 Employee sh all be responsible for the s upervision of groups
of employees in the performance of routine t asks.
Ind icative du ties of an employee at this level would incl ude , or
be similar to:-
The supervis ion of routine hygiene operacions. the co-
ordina ti on of work for employees on the individual meal
packing li ne, o r du ties of similar extent.
Or , when responsible, for the supervision of up to and
including five employees .
(9) • Employee Leve l 6' - ( I 05%) s ha ll mean an employee
whose skills and dut ies include, in addition to that prescribed for a
Level 5 Employee, the supervision of grou ps o f employees in the
performance of co mplex tasks.
Indicative duties o f an employee at this leve l would include, or
be similar to:
- the co-ordination and supervision of e mp loyees in the
vegetable processing room.
- the co-ordination and superv ision of emp loyees operating
the main stream j acketed kettles
( I 0) 'Major processi ng machine s' s hall mean an d inc lude
similar complex machines to:
Bakery/meat reve nt ovens
Greer Multipurpose Oven
Steam Pe eler
Urschel Dicer
Steam Jacketed Kettled
( 11 ) ' Minor Processing Machines· sha ll mea n a nd include
similar machines to Holac dicer, Cimitrol, Foam c leaner , tray
erectors, carton sealers. printers , computers, qua lity testing
equipment, forklifts.''.
2 . In clause 9 (Wages and Extra Paymen ts):-
(a) by deleting subclause ( I) and in serting the following in
lieu thereof:-
"Wages and Ex t ra Payments
9 .( I) The minimum rate s o f wages payable to the fo ll owing
classes o f employees s hall be:-
(a) As from 15/3/ 94
Classi fi cation
l~e vd 6
I nterim
Min im um
Classific ation
Rate
Pe r Weck
s
Leading Hand Pl ant Operator .. . 4 12.35
l.e,,d 5
Leading ll and Plam Operator. .. 40 0 90
l.nd.f
Freezer Hand ..... ....... .. 38 1.40
Pl ant Operator ·· ·•••···· 370,00
/,cw/ JA
Quality Control Operator ... .. ... .. 38 8 .40
Quality Co11 1ro l Assistant ... ... .. .. 383 .00
Freezer Hand .................. .......... 381 .40
Plant Operator ..... . ... ..... .. . 3 70 .0 0
Plant Attendant... . ... .... .. . 360.30
Ui-e /311
Pl an t Operator ..... ....... 370.00
l,e,·d 2
Pla m Opera tor . ······· •·• ·· ..,•.. 37 000
Interi m
Supplemcn1ary
Pa)'lnen1
Por Week
$
(N nte2i
18 .05
18.00
18.00
18 .0 0
8.00
10.50
12. 10
18.00
18.00
1.l.50
8.00
Awa1d
Ra 1c
Excc-ss as from
Paymcnl I .S/ Jf9il
Pe r' Week Pe r \\' ed.
s s
(;s:o tc I J i1'otc I J
4.10.40
418.90
399.40
.188.00
2.90 39\1.30 '
393.50
393.50
388 .00
3 78.30
38 .1.50
54 0 383.40 • •
-- 1 of 2 --
~
966 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE [ 19 August, 1994
Classi fication
Minjmum
Cla ss ification
Rate
P<r W eek
$
Interim
Suppl em entary
Pa)'m cnt
Per \Veek
s
(Note 2)
Rate
Excess as from
Paymem 15/3/94
Per Week Per Week
$ s
(!'<ate I) (Note I l
Plant Attendant .. ... .. . .. ..... .. .... 360. 30 12 . 30 372.60
level 1
NIA . .. .................... .. .... ... . ... . 342 . 10 8.00 350.10
(b) As From I 3/ 9/94
Supplementary Excess
Base Ra te Paymcn1 Payment
Classificat ion Pe r Week Pe r Week Per Week
s s s
(Nore2) ( Nore I )
Award
Rate
as fr om
13/9/94
Per Weck
s
(Nore I)
Level 6 ..... . ..... 38 3.50 62.60
60.00
57 90
56.10
53.40
50.60
446. 10
425.20
408.50
396. 40 *
378.00 ••
Level 5 ..............365.20
I.eve! 4 . .... .350.60
Level 3 ..............337.40
Leve l 2 ..............3 I 9 .20
Level I .............. 299.50
2.90
5.40
350. 10
Note I The Award Rate includes wage increases and
adjustments arising from State Wage Case decisions
colloquially referred to as: 2nd Tier Adjustment; Ist (2
parts) and 2nd Structural Efficiency Adjustmen ts;
Minimum Ra tes Adjustment and Safety Net Adjustment.
Aris ing from these adjustmenl certain 'Excess
Payments ' have also been identified and arc payable to
employees engaged in such classifications as part of
their Award Rate. These 'E xcess Payments' are not
subject to absorption of the Safety Net Adjustment.
Such •Excess Payment' shall not have any subsequent
percen tage based wage increase app li ed to i t.
Excess Payment has application to Qua li ty
Con trol Operators translated to Level 3.
0 Ex cess Payment has app li ca tion to Plan t
Operators translated to Levd 2.
Note 2 The supplementary payment at each classification leve l
includes an $8.00 adjustment reflecting Lhc ap plication
of the arbitrated Safety Net Adjustment Principle
enuneiated in the February 1994 Review of Wage f ixing
Principles. Consistent with the requirements of th at
principle 1h e $8.00 Safety Net Adjustment is absorbable
to the extent of any equivalent amount in rates of pay -
whether overaward, award, industrial agreement or
certified agreement - in excess of the min im um rates
(classification rate and supplemen tary payment)
prescribed in accordance with the October 1989 State
Wage Case decision and adj usted in accordance with the
July 1991 State Wage Case decision.
· overaward f'ayment' is defin ed as the amount in
rates of pay which an employee would receive in
excess of the minimum award wage as prescribed in
this Industrial Agreement for the class ification in
which such employee is en gaged which applied
immediately prior to the date of operation of this
va riation:
Provided that this defin ition shall exclude ovcrtimt.
sh ifi allowances. penalty rates. expens<: related
(b)
allowances, industry allowances, disability
allowances, vacation allowances, special rales or
allowances, responsibility allowances, or any other
ancillary payments of a like nalure described by this
Indu strial Agreement.
The percentage relativities (clause 3 (Definitions))
relate to percentages applying before the application
of the $8.00 arbi1ratcd Safety Ne t Adjustment made
in accordance with lhe February, 1994, Review of
Wage Fixing Principles. The perce ntage re lativities
should also be applied by excluding amounts s hown
in the 'E.xcess Payment' column in any calculati on s
of relativities.''; and
by deleting subclauses (3), (4i and (9) and inserting a
new subclause (3) "Frecie r Di sabil it y Allowance·' as
follows:-
''(3) Em pl oyees required to s ubs tantially work in
te mperatures of below -1 . I•c shall, in addition to a ll other
condilions. be ent it led lo an allowance of $13.30 per week." .
3. In subclause ( I) of clause 12 (Sick Leave) by inserting the
followin g proviso:-
" Provided that the sick leave prescribed here in shall be
cumu lative, but un less the employe.r and employee otherwise
agree, no employee shall be entitled to receive, and no
employer shall be bound to make payment for more 1han
thirteen weeks' absence from work through illness in any
one year.".
Dated thi s fourteenth day of March, 1994
Dy the Commission,
(LS .) M.J. CALLEN,
lnduslrial Registrar
Operative Date: 15 March 1994
Variation - $8.00 Safety Net Adjustment and Min im um Rates
Adjustment
Released: 8 August 1994
####################################################/1##
19 August, 1994] QUE ENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTR IAL GAZETTE 967
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QIRC/1994/439