Culhane v St. Joseph's College [1994] QIRC 36 (1994) 145 QGIG 544
544 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE [ 11 March, 1994
####################################################
QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
industrial Relations Act 1990
s. 174 - - application for reinstatement
Barry JamP; Culhane
AND
St. Joseph's College
(No. 8727 of 1993)
COMMISSIONER DEMPSEY n ~ebruary l '194
Termination of EmploymPnt - Dismissal - Reinstatement -
Allegation of Masturbation - Evidence - Medical Evidence --
Conflict oi evidence - Case Law - Dismissal Harsh, Unjust and
Unfair - Reinstatement Ordered -
REPORT ON DECISION (As Edited)
In giving his decision from the Bench on Thursday, 17
FPbruary 1994, Commissinner Dempsey said:-
"The applicant in this matter, Barry James Culhane, seeks
relief pursuant to the provisions of section 175 of the
Industrial Relations Act l 990 in the form thdt hP be
reinstated to the position he held as teacher/librarian at St.
Joseph's College, Sandgate Road, Boondall. Mr C.:ulhane's
emplovment was terminated on 11 November 1993 for
reasons th.1t have been canvassed extensively in these
proceedings.
Mr Culham>, the applicant, has testified in these proceedings,
as has a number oi medical practitioners and experts who
were called in support of the applicant's contentions For
the respondent, Br. Harney, the college principal, was called
dnd attested to the fact that he responded to allegations
lodged by Mrs Aileen O'Corman. He investigated all of the
people who were present at a meeting held in the
information technology workroom 011 t 5 October 1993. It
was on this date, and in that place, that the allegation of
inappropriate conduct took place.
I he inappropriate conduct, on Br. I larney's evidence, was
elaliorated on to the extent that such conduct was in fact
masturbation and that it was for the conduct of masturbation
11 March, 1994 J QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE
that Mr Culhane in the presence of five women WdS
suspended. The suspensio,1 fol lowed investigations and
further investigations led to the decision to dismiss Mr
Culhane.
The five women who were present also gave evidence in
these proceedings Two of them claimed that .Mr Culhane
was masturbating. However, close examination of their
evidence reveals the fact that their observations were
minimal, and I ;hould say that much more will need to he
said about this. Br. Harney's evidence is of such significance
that, in my opinion, it is clear that Mr Culhane was
d1sm1ssed for allegedly masturbating during the C<Jurse of the
mPeting previously rererred to.
Over the last six hearing days, and the period between
sittings, I have considered the evidence, and I have
concluded th..it the outcome of this matter must turn on the
events of 15 October. I have also given a great degree of
consideration .to the medical evidence provided and share.
some of the views expressed by Mr Garske that there is little
to 1;uarantee that the presenre of a number of the medical
ailments actually existed at the time the meeting took place.
However, on thr balance of probabilities, it is feasible to
conclude that some may have existed.
Having said that, there is one condition that I am satisfied
existed then, as It has in the past, and that remained until
atter the events of 15 Ortober, and that is the condition of
impotence. Therefore, tdking into consideration all of thP
evidence and the gravity of the accusation of masturbation, I
have formed thr view that to sustain this allegation,
reasonable proof, not just opinion or assertion, is necessary,
and in this matter th..it reasonable proof, in my opinion, is
not there. Under these circumstances I find that the
dismissal of Barry James Culhane is harsh, unjust and unfair.
Pursuant to the provisions of secl.ion 175, having heard the
dpplication for relief from dismissal. I order as follows:
In accordance with the provisions of section 175(2) that
Barry James Culhane be reinstated to his former position
of teacher/librarian at St, Joseph's College, Sandgate
Road from Monday 28 March.
Further Order thdt the applicant be paid for all
entitlrments from the datr ot his dismissal to the date of
his reinstatement.
The purpose of ordering a prospective date for reinstatement
,s to give the college an opportunity to discuss this matter
with five of the witnesses. who attested during these
proceedings and anyone else 11 might feel nPcessary, and to
provide appropriate counselling where it is rleemPd
necessary.
I am proposing this course of action having considered the
;ubmissions of Mr I awson that .;II of the witnesses cailed by
the respondent were honest, and that in two there was
mistaken belief. I accept that proposition.
The grounrl; and rt:dsons for this rlecision wil! follow in due
rourse and will be delivered as speedily as possible. At the
time of giving those grounds and reasons I will address the
matters raised with respect to the submissions and
suggestions relevant to the Anti-discrimination Act.
·1 he Commission orders accordinglv.".
0dted this twenty-second tfay of February, 1994.
By the Commission.
[L.S.] M J. CALLEN,
Industrial registrar
Appearances:-
Mr J. Lawson (instructr;d bv Prtrr Channell :rnd Associates) ior the
applicant. '
Mr P. Garske for the Queensland Confederation of Industry
Limited, Union 01 Emp!oyers, (instructed by Messrs Thynne and
Macartney) tor St. Joseph's College.
Operative Date: N/A
Report on Decision - - Reinstatement
Released: 25 Febru..iry 1994
545
-- 1 of 1 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QIRC/1994/036