Chivers v Rannard [1993] QCA 518
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL [1993] QCA 518
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND C.A. No. 245 of 1993
Brisbane
[Chivers v. Rannard]
W.P. CHIVERS
v.
RODNEY FRANCIS RANNARD (Applicant)
________________________________________________________________
_
DAVIES J.A.
PINCUS J.A.
MOYNIHAN S.J.A.
________________________________________________________________
_
udgment delivered 14/12/1993 J
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - THE COURT
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE GRANTED.
APPEAL ALLOWED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SENTENCES OF NINE MONTHS'
IMPRISONMENT IMPOSED ON EACH OF THE FIRST SIX CHARGES ARE SET
ASIDE AND SENTENCES OF SIX MONTHS' IMPRISONMENT ARE SUBSTITUTED
IN EACH CASE. THE OTHER SENTENCES THE SUBJECT OF THIS
APPLICATION ARE CONFIRMED.
________________________________________________________________
_
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE - DRUG OFFENCES -
Applicant sentenced to 9 months for supplying
cannabis sativa - Whether manifestly excessive -
28 years of age, no previous convictions,
suffered from Crohn's disease - Immediate
confession, pleaded guilty at earliest possible
stage, assisted police in identifying suppliers
- Whether magistrate failed to reduce sentence
for guilty plea and co-operation - Part of
significant commercial operation - 6 months
substituted
-- 1 of 7 --
2
Counsel: Mr P. Rutledge for the Respondent
Mr A. Rafter for the Applicant
Solicitors: Director of Prosecutions for the Respondent
Legal Aid office for the Applicant
Date(s) of Hearing: 13 August 1993
-- 2 of 7 --
3
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND C.A. No. 245 of 1993
Brisbane
Before Mr Justice Davies
Mr Justice Pincus
Mr Justice Moynihan
[Chivers v. Rannard]
W.P. CHIVERS
v.
RODNEY FRANCIS RANNARD (Applicant)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT - THE COURT
Judgment delivered 14/12/1993
The applicant was convicted on 8 July 1993 upon ten charges: six
of supplying a dangerous drug, namely cannabis sativa; one of
possession of tainted property, namely money, a sum of $75.00;
one of possession of aluminium foils; one of possession of a
dangerous drug, namely cannabis sativa; and one of possession of
utensils, namely a water pipe and a cone. On each of the first
six charges of supply the applicant was sentenced to nine
months' imprisonment. On the charge of possession of tainted
property he was sentenced to three months' imprisonment. On the
charge of possession of the aluminium foils he was sentenced to
two months' imprisonment. On the charge of possession of
cannabis he was sentenced to six months' imprisonment. And on
the charge of possession of utensils he was sentenced to two
-- 3 of 7 --
4
months' imprisonment. All sentences were to be served
concurrently. He seeks leave to appeal against all except the
last of these sentences which, not being an indictable offence,
cannot properly be the subject of this application.
The applicant is 28 years of age, having been born on 16 June
1965. He has no previous convictions of any kind.
On the afternoon of 6 April 1993 the police conducted a search
of the applicant's residence in Cairns. They located in his
bedroom nine foils of cannabis which the applicant later
admitted he intended to supply to other persons; $120.00 in
currency of which the applicant admitted $75.00 was from the
sale of cannabis; four pieces of foil which the applicant
admitted were to place cannabis in for the purpose of sale; and
a small plastic container containing two grams of cannabis which
the applicant said was for his own use. When interviewed by the
police the applicant admitted to selling foils of cannabis over
the preceding two months. He said that he had been receiving
the foils from two separate persons to sell and in return he
received free marijuana to smoke himself. He admitted to
selling three foils of cannabis earlier that day to three
separate persons for $25.00 a foil. He also admitted to selling
two foils to another person the previous day for $50.00. He
estimated that over the preceding two or three months he had
sold 100 to 200 foils usually receiving $25.00 each. He passed
all of this money on to his suppliers, the only benefit to him
being in the form of marijuana for his own use. It was said on
-- 4 of 7 --
5
his behalf to the learned sentencing magistrate that the
marijuana was sold by him only to a close circle of friends.
In addition to confessing as he did the full extent of his
activities, the applicant pleaded guilty. In sentencing him,
the magistrate refused to give him any credit for his guilty
plea, apparently because it was not a prompt plea. The matter
first came before the court on 7 April 1993 but the applicant
did not plead guilty until 8 July 1993 when he was sentenced.
However, there appears to have been a explanation for this: the
applicant was suffering from Crohn's Disease from which he was
incapacitated for a substantial part of the period between those
two dates and consequently unable to appear at all. The
magistrate apparently failed to have regard to this. In our view
he should have reduced the sentence which he otherwise intended
to impose because of that plea.
Moreover, in addition to his prompt and full confession it
appears that the applicant cooperated with the police to the
extent of advising them of the first names of his two suppliers
and showing them the house in which one of them lived and the
caravan park where the other lived. His Worship does not appear
to have appreciated this because he said, in sentencing the
applicant, that he had not apparently assisted the police as to
the people with whom he was involved.
Because of the learned magistrate's errors in failing to reduce
the sentence for the plea of guilty and in failing to appreciate
-- 5 of 7 --
6
that the applicant had assisted the police as to the people with
whom he was involved, we think that the exercise of his
sentencing discretion miscarried and that consequently this
Court is free to impose whatever sentence it considers
appropriate in the circumstances.
Against the applicant it must be said that the offences of
supplying cannabis sativa were serious ones. Without suppliers
such as the applicant producers and dealers would not have the
ready market which they have. The number of sales admitted to
by the appellant over the preceding two or three months (100 to
200 foils) makes us sceptical of his assertion that he sold only
to a close circle of friends. In any case he was plainly part
of a significant commercial operation. And because the
applicant was paid for his services in the form of cannabis for
his own use it is wrong to say, as his counsel submitted to us,
that he derived no financial benefit from his part in the
operation. Moreover it is notorious that offences of this kind
are prevalent in Cairns, a matter which the magistrate no doubt
had in mind.
We have already mentioned in the applicant's favour his
immediate confession to the police, his plea of guilty and his
assistance in identifying his suppliers. In addition, the
magistrate was told that the applicant smoked the drug himself
in order to relieve symptoms of pain from the disease which he
suffers. And, as we mentioned earlier, the applicant has no
prior convictions of any kind.
-- 6 of 7 --
7
Notwithstanding the absence of any prior convictions, we think
that the commercial nature of the appellant's operation
justified the imposition of a term of imprisonment. However, in
view of the absence of prior convictions, the appellant's plea
of guilty and his cooperation with the police we think that a
sentence of nine months is excessive and that an appropriate
sentence would be six months' imprisonment. We would therefore
grant the application, allow the appeal, set aside the sentence
of nine months for each of the first six charges and substitute
in each case a sentence of six months. We would not interfere
with the other sentences imposed.
-- 7 of 7 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/1993/518