Casmif Pty Ltd v Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd & Ors [1993] QSC 363
,,
' I
Sc_9.3/36a
·~
<=6!P
··
~,
ttr State RepOrting Bureaz
~-'\'
..
!!Ell.~
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
(Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold
without the written authority
of
the Director, State Reporting Bureau.)
SUPREME
COURT
OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL
JURISDICTION
KIEFEL J
ijo
1136
of
1990
CASMIF PTY
LTD
and
FARROW MORTGAGE
SERVICESPTY LTD
and
ROBERT FRED BYRNES
AND
GREGORY
MICHAEL
MOLONEY
BRISBANE
..
DATE
03/09/93
ORDER
-
-
/
1
REV!SED
CO?iES
ISSUED
State Rcpor1ing Bureau
DateofS/
(Of
13
Plaintiff
First
Defendant
Second Defendant
-·
~
,/
-- 1 of 5 --
030993
evs/adt
(Kiefel J)
HER HONOUR:
You
say
that
the pleadings
in
168
of
1992
really
need
to
be
brought
into line?
MR
JACKSON:
HER HONOUR:
that?
Yes.
Do I
need
to
make
any
orders
with
respect to
MR
MORTON:
I
don't cavil that
they
need
amendment
and
that
they
need
to
be
changed.
HER HONOUR:
What
needs
to
be done?
I
mean,
complete
pleading
or
amending
each
of the pleadings
in
the action?
MR
MORTON:
Substantial
surgery, yes.
MR
JACKSON:
Really bring
them
into line in
terms
of the
defence
and
counterclaim with
Mcilveen,
to
raise
some
of the
grounds
which
are raised in
Casmif's statement of
claim,
and
then for
us
to
respond
in the
same
way
that
we
have responded
in
the defence
and
counterclaim in the
Casmif
action, in the
Mcilveen
action that
is
by
way
of reply
and answer.
HER HONOUR: Do I
need
to give directions
as to the dates
upon which each
of those
amended
pleadings
will
be
delivered,
or
can
I
leave that to the parties to organise prior to the
next mention date?
MR
JACKSON:
We
would suggest that
a
date
by which the
pleadings could be delivered might be a good idea so that
ORDER
2
•
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 2 of 5 --
030993 evs/adt (Kiefel J)
everybody knows where they stand in terms of keeping it going
between now and the mention date.
HER HONOUR: Perhaps if we set the next mention date sometime
in the week commencing 20 September; gentlemen. Are there any
dates that are inconvenient in that week?
MR MORTON: Only the Thursday, Your Honour.
MR JACKSON: We are an open book.
HER HONOUR: All right. Perhaps if we make it on the
Wednesday of that week. That will give us a few days, in case
there are any problems, to set it down for argument, since I
am in Civil then. So, 22 September will be the next mention
h
date.
MR JACKSON: Might we suggest then that the 10th be the date
for the amended defence and counterclaim in the Mcilveen
action, then the 17th for the amended reply and answer?
HER HONOUR: Do you have any difficulty with that,
Mr Morton?
MR MORTON: No, Your Honour.
HER HONOUR: There will be an order in those terms.
MR JACKSON: Then we will deliver the additional witness
statements that I have mentioned from the Bassetts. That
ORDER
3
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 3 of 5 --
030993
evs/adt
(Kiefel
J)
doesn't
need
to------
HER
HONOUR:
Be
the subject of
a
direction,
because
it
is
already
caught
by
the
earlier
orders.
MR
JACKSON:
Yes,
we
think so.
HER HONOUR:
Perhaps
if
I
make
a
general
direction,
as
you
say,
so
the
parties
know
what
their
deadlines are,
that
any
further
statements,
save
for the
first
defendant's
expert
accountant's
statement
be
delivered
on
or before
10
September
next.
MR
MORTON:
Would
Your Honour
be
prepared
to
leave
it
outstanding
till
the
17th?
HER HONOUR:
The
question of
damages?
I
hadn't quite
got
to
that.
That
was
the
direction
I
was
going
to
make,
that
you
deliver
a
schedule of the
damages you
claim under each head
of
damage.
MR
MORTON:
So
long as
that
is left
outstanding
until
the
17th,
I
don't think
I
have-----
HER HONOUR:
I am
not going
to leave that outstanding
until
the 17th.
It
should have been done
a
long time ago.
ORDER
4
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 4 of 5 --
030993 evs/adt (Kiefel J)
HER HONOUR: The earlier direction I gave with respect to
witness' statements in terms of the order ought to exclude
generally not just the first defendant's expert but statements
by witnesses with respect to the issue of damages.
HER HONOUR: I direct that the· plaintiff deliver to the
defendants a complete schedule of the damages it claims, the
schedule of damages identifying each of the heads of damage
relied upon and particularising the damages claimed under each
head, and that it deliver to the defendants any additional
statements of witnesses to be relied upon in proof of damage
on or before 17 September next.
HER HONOUR: The only other order that needs to be made is the
costs of this mention; parties' costs in the cause.
ORDER
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 5 of 5 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/1993/363