Barnett, Re, Re Toohey [1991] QSC 241
.J,
/
11'
.
~,
~0,-
10
30
40
so
;.·:.·.:;-
IN
THE SUPREME
COURT OF
QUEENSLAND
CIVIL
JURISDICTION
o;s.
No. 20
of
1991
BEFORE
MR.
JUSTICE
DEMACK
MACKAY,
31
JULY
1991
{Copyright
in
this
transcript
is
vested
in
the
Crown.
Copies
thereof
must
not
be
made
or
sold
without
the written authority of
the
Chief Court
Reporter,Court
Reporting Bureau.)
IN
THE MATTER
of
the
estate
of
WILLIAM
HAROLD
BARNETT
late
of
Rockhampton
in the State
of
Queensland,
Retired
-and-
IN
THE MATTER
of
an
application
by
JEAN
TOOHEY
ORDER
HIS
HONOUR:
This
is
an
application
by
Delma
Phyllis
Gray,
a
beneficiary in the
estate
of
William Harold
Barnett,
for
an
order
that
the
sum
of
$100,000
be
paid
immediately
to
her
in part distribution
of the
estate.
on
Friday
last,
Jean
Toohey,
who
alleges
that
she
was
the
de
facto wife of the
deceased
for
a
long
period,
was
granted leave
by
me
to
proceed
in
an
application
under
the
Succession Act
for better
provision for her
from
the estate
ot the
deceased.
The
legal representatives of
Mrs. Toohey
had advised the legal representatives of the beneficiaries
that
such an
application
would be
made
about
12 months ago.
It
appears
that the other beneficiary, Victor William
Barnett and Mrs. Gray, waited until after the nine month
period had expired from the date of the death of William
G 214-Govt. Printer, Old.
1
10
20
30
40
so
60
-- 1 of 3 --
~,
}
it
;_1.
10
20
30
40
50
60
arold Barnett before
they
sought
letters
of
administration.
This
clearly
indicates
that
they
were
aware
that
an
application
was
likely
to
be
made
and,
consequently,
when
the application
was made,
it
should
have
come
as
no
surprise.
When
an
application
is
made
late,
obviously
one
of
the
most
important
things
is
the question of prejudice
to
the
beneficiaries
of
the
estate.
I
do
not
recall
being
informed
anything
of
this
contract
which
is
referred to
in
Mr.
Fleming's
affidavit
of today.
According
to
this
affidavit,
Mrs. Gray
has
entered
into
the contract to
buy
a
house
in
Canberra
and
urgently
needs
$100,000
to
settle
the
contract.,
It
seems
to
me
that
the
time
to
make
this
known
was
last
Friday,
when
the issue
should
have been
brought
to
my
attention.
It
does
not
seem
~o me,
on
the material
before
me,
that
any such
order
can be
made
today
or,
indeed,
any
such
order
ought
to
be
made.
The
material before
me
has
some
inconsistencies
in
it
of.
a
very
significant
nature.
Paragraph
13
says
that
Mr.
Fleming
has
assets
of
$370,000 under
his control in the
estate.
In
his
letter
to the
solicitors
for
Mrs. Toohey, he
refers to
$270,000
presently
remaining deposited
in
an
investment account.
The two
statements
may
not
be
inconsistent but
on
their
face they are not
easily
held
together
and
the
sum
involved
is
a
substantial
one.
In the circumstances,
I am
not able to
make
the order
that is
sought.
However,
if
a
full
disclosure of the size
of the estate is
made
to
Mrs. Toohey's
solicitors,
it
may
be
possible for there to
be some agreement as to the release of
an appropriate
sum.
G 214-Govt. Printer, Qld.
2
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 2 of 3 --
10
30
40
50
· 60
so I wi11· adjourn the application to
a date to be
fixed, to be brought on on one day's notice by
either party.
G 214--Govt. Printer, Qld.
3
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/1991/241