Compex Computer Solutions Pty Ltd, Re [1990] QSC 241
IN
THE SUPREME
COURT
OF QUEENSLAND
O.S.
No.
538
of
1990
IN
THE
MATTER
of
The
Companies
(Queensland)
Code
IN
THE
MATTER
of
COMPEX
COMPUTER
SOLUTIONS PTY. LTD.
(formerly
known
as
ASHDOWN
COMPUTER
SOLUTIONS PTY. LTD.
EXTEMPORE
REASONS: SENIOR
MASTER
HORTON
Q.C.
Delivered
the
Twenty-sixth
day
of July,
1990
This
is
an
application
by
Bull
HN
Information
Systems
Australia
Pty. Ltd.
for the
appointment
of
a
provisional
liquidator
to the
company
Compex
Computer
Solutions Pty. Ltd.
Up
until
the
29th June,
1990,
the
company
traded as
Ashdown
Computer
Solutions Pty.
Ltd.
and on
that
day
it
changed
its
name
to
Compex
Computer
Solutions Pty. Ltd. Curiously
enough on
24th
July,
1990
a
search
of the
Corporate
Affairs
records revealed
that
Mr.
Charles
Clifford
Ashdown
and
Mr.
Clive
Ronald
Ashdown
were
the Directors of
Ashdown
Enterprises
(Wholesale)
Pty. Ltd.
which
in
itself is
a
major
creditor
of the present
company
to
the
extent of
$200,000. That
it
is
the
largest creditor
of the
subject
company
is
beyond
dispute.
This
date of
29th June,
1990
is
a
significant
one
as
on
27th
June,
1990
the applicant served
a
s.
364
notice
on
Ashdown
Computer
Solutions Pty. Ltd.
A
search of the Corporate
Affairs office
shows
that
the
directorate of the subject
company Compex
Computer
Solutions
Pty. Ltd. (formerly
known
as
Ashdown
Computer
Solutions Pty.
Ltd.) comprises of Charles Clifford
Ashdown,
Clive Ronald
Ashdown
and Michael John Hatfield.
Hence, we
are
left
with
a
situation
where a company some two days
after it is
served with
a 364
notice changes
its
name
to an entirely different
name and then
-- 1 of 2 --
l
sets about after service of the 364 notice to institute a members
voluntary winding-up calling both meetings of the company and
meetings of the creditors tomorrow.
It is clear that the company is hopelessly insolvent. It
is equally clear that when one looks at the creditors that a
company which has both Mr. Ashdowns as directors in common with
the subject company is the principal creditor of the subject
company and this creditor company rejoices in a name curiously
similar to what the subject company previously enjoyed.
As I have said the company is hopelessly insolvent and it
may well be that the principal asset of the subject company is
any goodwill that attaches to the name. The present situation
would be that it would be very easy for both Mr. Ashdowns as
directors of the creditor company to be the unconscious
recipients through their company Ashdown Enterprises (Wholesale)
Pty. Ltd. of the goodwill attaching to the subject company.
Hence in my view it is essential that this fragile asset be
preserved in the hands of an independent person pending the
winding-up company and I propose to appoint a provisional
liquidator.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/1990/241