Ellis v Cavell & Ors [1990] QSC 143
10
20
30
40
so
60
IN
THE SUPREME
COURT OF
QUEENSLAND
CIVIL
JURISDICTION
BEFORE
MR.
JUSTICE
KELLY
S.P.J
BRISBANE, 4 APRIL
1990
No.
3726
of
1988
(Copyright
in this transcript
is
vested
in
the
Crown.
Copies
thereof
must
not
be
made
or sold without the
written authority
of
the
Chief Court
Reporter,Court
Reporting
Bureau.)
BETWEEN:
CLIVE LESTER
ELLIS
-and-
TONY
CAVELL
-and-
PAUL BOBBIEMAN
-and-
FAI
GENERAL
INSURANCE CO.
LTD
ORDER
Plaintiff
First
Defendant
Second
Defendant
Defendantby
election
HIS
HONOUR:
An
application
has been
made
by
the
defendant
by
election
for
adjournment
of
this
trial.
The
reason
for the application
is
a
change
in
the basis
on
which
economic
loss
is
being claimed; whereas
previously the claim
was some
$270,000,
it
is
now
something over
one
million
and
this is
based
on
a
report of
an
accountant
which
was
received
by
the defendants'
solicitors
only yesterday
and as
to
which
quite understandably there
has been
no
reasonable
ppportunity of proper examination.
It is clear, of course, that there has been
non-compliance with the relevant provisions of Order 39,
-Govt.
Printer, Old.
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 1 of 2 --
10
20
30
40
50
60
Rule
29
and
it
goes
without saying
that
to
produce
a
document
of
this
nature
at
this
very, very
late
stage,
some
considerable
time
after
a
trial
date
has been
allocated,
is,
I
might
say,
quite
unpardonable.
In
my
view,
it
is
not
really
to
the
point
that
much
of the
material
upon
which
reliance
is
placed
in
the
report
is
to
be
found
in
taxation
returns
which have
already
been
made
available.
The
plain
fact
is
that,
as
I
would
see
it
on
what
I
have been
told,
a
complete
change
has been
made
in
the
approach
now
being
made
by
the
plaintiff
to
the
calculation
of
his
economic
loss
and
it
would
be
quite
unreasonable
to
foresee the
defendant
to
go
to
trial
in that state
of
affairs.
Consequently,
there .is
no-
practical alternative,
as
I
would
see
it,
to
adjourning the matter
to
the
callover
list
and what
I
propose
to
do
is
to
order
that
the
trial
be
adjourned
to
the
callover
list
to
be
placed
in
its
original
position
on
that
list
and
I
do
so
order.
I
order
that
the costs of today's hearing
to
be
taxed
be
paid
by
the
plaintiff
to the
defendant
by
election.
-Govt.
Printer, Old.
2
10
20
30
40
50
60
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/1990/143