County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
i
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules
2002
S.R. No. 127/2002
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Rule Page
1. Object 1
2. Authorising provisions 1
3. Commencement 1
4. Principal Rules 1
5. Filing of originating process 1
6. Personal service of originating process 2
7. Affidavit of service 2
8. Amendment to Order 28 2
9. New Part 2 to Order 28 2
PART 2—ELECTRONIC FILING 2
28.08 Application of Part 2
28.09 Definitions 2
28.10 Authorised provider may send request to file
documents electronically 3
28.11 Registrar may accept a document for filing 3
28.12 Registrar may reject a document 4
28.13 Documents that may not be filed electronically 4
28.14 Evidence of filing 5
28.15 Production of original document 5
28.16 Retention of original documents 6
28.17 Authorised provider 6
10. Affidavits 6
11. Filing Confirmation Notice 6
═══════════════
ENDNOTES 9
-- 1 of 10 --
1
STATUTORY RULES 2002
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court Act 1958
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules
2002
A majority of the Judges of the County Court makes the
following Rules:
1. Object
The object of these Rules is to facilitate the
electronic filing of documents in the Court.
2. Authorising provisions
These Rules are made under section 78 of the
County Court Act 1958 and all other enabling
powers.
3. Commencement
These Rules come into operation on 1 January
2003.
4. Principal Rules
In these Rules, the County Court Rules of
Procedure in Civil Proceedings 19991 are called
the Principal Rules.
5. Filing of originating process
For Rule 5.11(1)(b) of the Principal Rules
substitute—
"(b) A proceeding is filed—
(i) when the Registrar or proper officer
receives the originating process and
seals and dates the same; or
-- 2 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
2
(ii) if the originating process is sent to the
Court electronically, when it is received
by the Court's information system
known as CLMS.".
6. Personal service of originating process
In Rule 6.03(2) of the Principal Rules, after
"Rule 5.11" insert ", and in the case of originating
process filed electronically, shall have attached to
it a filing confirmation notice that has been sealed
by the Registrar".
7. Affidavit of service
After Rule 6.17(3) of the Principal Rules insert—
"(4) In the case of originating process filed
electronically, an affidavit of service shall
also exhibit a copy of the filing confirmation
notice.".
8. Amendment to Order 28
After the heading to Order 28 of the Principal
Rules insert—
"PART 1 —GENERAL".
9. New Part 2 to Order 28
After Rule 28.07 of the Principal Rules insert—
'PART 2—ELECTRONIC FILING
28.08 Application of Part
This Part applies to the electronic filing of
documents in the Court.
28.09 Definitions
In this Part—
"authorised provider" means a person or
body listed in Rule 28.17;
r. 6
-- 3 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
3
"authorised user" means a person or body
who has arranged for an authorised
provider to file documents in the Court
electronically, in accordance with the
provisions of this Part.
28.10 Authorised provider may send request to
file documents electronically
An authorised provider may on behalf of an
authorised user, send by electronic
communication to the Registrar, a document
for filing at Court.
28.11 Registrar may accept a document for filing
(1) If satisfied that a copy of a document sought
to be filed electronically in the Court by an
authorised provider complies with the
requirements of the Rules, the Registrar
must—
(a) retain a copy of the document; and
(b) record the date and time the document
was received and entered in the
information system of the Court known
as CLMS; and
(c) in the case of a document that is
required to be sealed and dated by the
Registrar, authorise the production of a
filing confirmation notice by electronic
communication to the authorised
provider.
(2) A filing confirmation notice shall be in
Form 28 and shall be sealed with the seal of
the Court.
Note: See Rule 28.04 for Rules applying to the seal of
the Court.
r. 9
-- 4 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
4
(3) If the Registrar receives by electronic
communication a copy of a document for
filing after 4.00 p.m. on a day the office of
the Court is open or on a day referred to in
Rule 3.08, subject to the Registrar being
satisfied that the document sought to be filed
in the Court complies with the requirements
of the Rules, the document shall be taken to
have been filed at 9.00 a.m. on the next day
the office of the Court is open.
28.12 Registrar may reject a document
If the Registrar is not satisfied that a copy of
a document sought to be filed in the Court
electronically complies with the
requirements of the Rules, the Registrar shall
send an electronic communication to the
authorised provider advising—
(a) that the document has not been filed in
the Court; and
(b) the reason it was not filed.
28.13 Documents that may not be filed
electronically
(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and any order of the
Court, the following documents may not be
filed in accordance with this Part—
(a) any document under the Adoption Act
1984 or any regulations under that Act;
(b) court books;
(c) any documents produced in answer to a
subpoena; and
(d) an exhibit to an affidavit.
r. 9
-- 5 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
5
(2) Paragraph (1)(d) does not apply to an exhibit
in an application under—
(a) Rule 5.12 (leave to extend the period of
validity of a writ);
(b) Rule 6.10 (for substituted service);
(c) Order 7 (for leave to proceed);
(d) Order 21 (for judgment in default of
appearance or pleading);
(e) Rule 24.02 (where a party fails to
comply with an order);
(f) Rule 68.02 (for leave to issue a
warrant).
28.14 Evidence of filing
For the avoidance of doubt but subject to any
order of the Court, Rule 40.08 applies to a
document referred to in a filing confirmation
notice as if the document is a document
purporting to be sealed with the seal of the
Court.
28.15 Production of original document
(1) At the request of a Judge or the Registrar, an
authorised user must produce the original
paper version of a document that has been
electronically filed in the Court.
(2) If, subsequent to a request under paragraph
(1), the authorised user cannot produce the
paper version of the document, a Judge or
the Registrar may order or direct that the
filing of the document be set aside or be of
no effect.
r. 9
-- 6 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
6
28.16 Retention of original documents
For the avoidance of doubt, the possession of
a filing confirmation notice does not relieve
an authorised user from any obligation to
retain an original document.
28.17 Authorised provider
The STATE OF QUEENSLAND through
CITEC, a commercial business of the
Queensland Government—ABN
52 566 829 700.'.
10. Affidavits
After Rule 43.09(2) of the Principal Rules
insert—
"(3) If a copy of an affidavit is sought to be filed
electronically in the Court under Part 2 of
Order 28, the copy of the affidavit must
contain an image of the affidavit that
includes a copy of the particulars required by
Rule 43.01(5) or, if applicable, Rule
43.02(1).".
11. Filing Confirmation Notice
After Form 19A to the Principal Rules insert—
"RULE 28.11(2)
FORM 28
FILING CONFIRMATION NOTICE
IN THE COUNTY COURT
OF VICTORIA
AT
To [name of authorised user]
r. 10
-- 7 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
7
An electronic copy of the following document—
[description of document]
was filed in the County Court in this proceeding under
Part 2 of Order 28 on [date] at [time].
CASE DETAILS
Case number—
Case [name of parties]—
List—
Cause of action—
Claim amount—
Your reference—
[Court seal]
The attached document has been filed in the County Court
of Victoria.
DATED:
Registrar".
Dated: 12 December 2002
MICHAEL ROZENES, Chief Judge E. H. CURTAIN
F. G. DYETT R. G. WILLIAMS
JOHN K. NIXON FRED DAVEY
FRANK WALSH STUART CAMPBELL
L. S. OSTROWSKI DAVID MORROW
W. FAGAN M. G. McINERNEY
G. R. G. CROSSLEY T. G. WODAK
M. HIGGINS F. J. SHELTON
B. STOTT A. P. DUCKETT
G. D. LEWIS MARILYN HARBISON
r. 11
-- 8 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
8
S. P. GEBHARDT JOHN BOWMAN
J. M. PANNAM J. NICHOLSON
TIMOTHY HOLT F. E. HOGAN
CAROLYN DOUGLAS I. E. LAWSON
TIM WOOD G. GULLACI
IAN C. ROBERTSON E. M. GAYNOR
LANSELL PILGRIM P. J. COISH
P. D. JENKINS K. R. HOWIE
B. J. KING J. A. CAMPTON
═══════════════
-- 9 of 10 --
S.R. No. 127/2002
County Court (Chapter I Amendment No. 10) Rules 2002
9
ENDNOTES
1 Rule 4: S.R. No. 20/1999. Reprint No. 1 incorporating amendments as at
27 September 2001. Subsequently amended by S.R. Nos 122/2001,
124/2001, 54/2002, 125/2002 and 126/2002.
Endnotes
-- 10 of 10 --