Connolly v Spence [2005] QCA 121
1
COURT OF APPEAL [2005] QCA 121
McMURDO P
KEANE JA
PHILIPPIDES J
Appeal No 729 of 2005
HUGH ANTHONY CONNOLLY Appellant
and
JUDITH CAROLINE SPENCE Respondent
BRISBANE
..DATE 15/04/2005
ORDER
-- 1 of 2 --
2
APPELLANT conducted his own case
MR M BURNS for the respondent
THE PRESIDENT: Mr Connolly has asked that this matter be
adjourned to enable him to obtain a lawyer to appear on his
behalf. It has been explained to him that an adjournment on
the day the matter has been listed for hearing will mean that
he will have to pay the costs thrown away by the adjournment
and he has indicated that he nevertheless wishes to continue
with his application for an adjournment.
In the circumstances Mr Connolly should then be given the
opportunity to have the assistance of a lawyer in this matter
but must understand that when the matter is next listed for
hearing, the matter will be expected to proceed whether or not
Mr Connolly is then legally represented. The matter will be
adjourned to a date to be fixed.
...
THE PRESIDENT: The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs
of today's hearing and the costs thrown away by the
adjournment.
...
-----
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/2005/121