TRPCEVSKI -v- DIXON [2026] WASC 303
[2026] WASC 303
Page 1
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : TRPCEVSKI -v- DIXON [2026] WASC 303
CORAM : MASTER RUSSELL
HEARD : 28 JULY 2026
DELIVERED : 28 JULY 2026
FILE NO/S : CIV 1905 of 2026
BETWEEN : Jimmy TRPCEVSKI as joint and several liquidator of
WESTPAGE PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN
099 709 789) as trustee for THE BURKE FAMILY
TRUST, WATTLEUP HOLDINGS PTY LTD (IN
LIQUIDATION) (ACN 009 036 382) as trustee for
THE MS JAGIELLO FAMILY TRUST, AND
FOUREX HOLDINGS PTY LTD (IN
LIQUIDATION) (ACN 602 595 059) in its own right
and as trustee for THE FOUREX FAMILY TRUST
First Plaintiff
Gregory Mathew PROUT as joint and several
liquidator of WESTPAGE PTY LTD (IN
LIQUIDATION) (ACN 099 709 789) as trustee for
THE BURKE FAMILY TRUST, WATTLEUP
HOLDINGS PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN
009 036 382) as trustee for THE MS JAGIELLO
FAMILY TRUST, AND FOUREX HOLDINGS PTY
LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 602 595 059) in its
own right and as trustee for THE FOUREX FAMILY
TRUST
Second Plaintiff
AND
-- 1 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
Page 2
Stephen Robert DIXON as liquidator of Colonarie Pty
Ltd (in Liquidation) as trustee for THE MATSINGER
FAMILY TRUST NO.2
First Defendant
COLONARIE PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN
008 987 997) as trustee for THE MATSINGER
FAMILY TRUST NO.2
Second Defendant
Catchwords:
Partnership - Dissolution of partnership pursuant to s 46(g) of the Partnership
Act 1895 (WA) - Appointment of receiver and manager over partnership - Just
and equitable that the partnership be dissolved - Receivers and managers
appointed over partnership - Turns on own facts
Legislation:
Partnership Act 1895 (WA) s 46(g), s 57
Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) s 25(9)
Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) O 51
Result:
Application granted
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
First Plaintiff : Mr D Butler
Second Plaintiff : Mr D Butler
First Defendant : Mr K Tse
Second Defendant : Mr K Tse
-- 2 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
Page 3
Solicitors:
First Plaintiff : Murcia Pestell Hillard
Second Plaintiff : Murcia Pestell Hillard
First Defendant : Mendelawitz Morton Commercial Lawyers
Second Defendant : Mendelawitz Morton Commercial Lawyers
Case(s) referred to in decision(s):
Nil
-- 3 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
MASTER RUSSELL
Page 4
MASTER RUSSELL:
(These reasons were delivered orally on 28 July 2026 and have been edited
from the court's record to include references and headings, to correct matters
of grammar and expression, and attach a copy of the orders made).
Introduction
1 On 24 March 2026, the plaintiffs, Jimmy Trpcevski and Gregory
Mathew Prout, were appointed as the joint and several liquidators of
Westpage Pty Ltd as trustee for the Burke Family Trust, Wattleup
Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for the MS Jagiello Family Trust and
Fourex Holdings Pty Ltd in its own capacity and as trustee for the
Fourex Family Trust.
2 By originating summons filed on 8 July 2026, the plaintiffs seek
orders for dissolution of the partnership known as the Axis Financial
Group (Partnership) pursuant to s 46(g) of the Partnership Act 1895
(WA) and related orders, including orders that they be appointed as
joint and several receivers and managers of the Partnership.
3 The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by
Mr Trpcevski on 8 July 2026.
4 The Partnership was formed pursuant to a partnership deed
executed on about 30 July 2004, which was subsequently amended by a
Partnership and Share Sale Agreement dated 19 February 2015.
5 The Partnership presently consists of the following equal partners:
(a) Westpage Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 099 709 789) as trustee
for the Burke Family Trust (Westpage);
(b) Wattleup Holding Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 009 036 382)
as trustee for the MS Jagiello Family Trust (Wattleup);
(c) Colonarie Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 008 987 997) as trustee
for the Matsinger Group Family Trust No 2 (Colonarie); and
(d) Fourex Holdings Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 602 595 059) as
trustee for the Fourex Family Trust (Fourex).
6 Mr Trpcevski and Mr Prout are the joint and several liquidators of
each of Westpage, Wattelup and Fourex.
-- 4 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
MASTER RUSSELL
Page 5
7 Stephen Robert Dixon was appointed as liquidator of Colonarie on
about 19 March 2026. He has been joined as the first defendant to the
application as liquidator of Colonarie, as trustee for the Matsinger
Family Trust No 2. Colonarie is the second defendant in its capacity as
trustee for the Matsinger Family Trust No 2.
8 Following service of the application, the parties have substantially
agreed to the orders sought in the application. For the reasons that
follow, I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make orders in the terms
sought and agreed to by the parties.
Background
9 Mr Trpcevski deposes in his affidavit to the relevant background
and the circumstances in which the application is made and the orders
are sought.
10 In summary, as outlined by counsel, in circumstances where each
of the corporate trustees of the relevant trusts are in liquidation, they
are, or are likely to have been, disqualified from acting as trustee upon
the appointment of the liquidator or liquidators in each case.
11 The plaintiffs as liquidators of Westpage, Wattleup and Fourex
currently hold funds of the Partnership totalling $103,815.76
(Partnership funds) in their firm's trust account.
12 They are uncertain as to whether the Partnership has been
dissolved by operation of law and seek orders of the court as to the
dissolution of the Partnership and associated orders so that they have
certainty and authority to deal with the trust assets in respect of the
associated family trusts, as receivers and managers of those trust assets.
13 The defendants have been served with the originating summons
and the supporting affidavit. Mr Trpcevski's and Mr Prout's consent to
act as receivers and managers was filed on 9 July 2026 in the
appropriate form.
14 On 20 July 2026, a memorandum of consent orders was filed
recording the parties' consent to the orders sought, as set out in the
memorandum.
Dissolution of Partnership
15 The court has the power to decree dissolution of a partnership on
the grounds set out in s 46 of the Partnership Act. Relevantly, pursuant
-- 5 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
MASTER RUSSELL
Page 6
to s 46(g), the Court may decree a dissolution of a partnership, on
application by a partner, where circumstances have arisen which, in the
opinion of the court, render it just and equitable that the partnership be
dissolved.
16 I am satisfied that in the circumstances of this case, as deposed to
in Mr Trpcevski's affidavit, that it is just and equitable that the
Partnership be dissolved and where each of the partners are under
external administration. Another relevant factor is that all of the
partners agree that the Partnership should be dissolved.
Appointment of receivers and managers
17 Section 25(9) of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) provides that
the Court may appoint a receiver where it appears that it is just and
convenient that such an order should be made. Order 51 of the Rules of
the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) sets out the matters to be considered in
relation to the appointment of receivers. I have considered those matters
and I am satisfied that it is just and convenient that receivers and
managers be appointed over the Partnership in the circumstances.
18 As noted, Mr Trpcevski and Mr Prout are the liquidators of three
of the four partners of the Partnership. They have provided their
consent to act as receivers and managers and are each registered
liquidators experienced in acting in such a capacity. The appointment of
receivers and managers is necessary to facilitate the realisation of the
assets of the Partnership and to distribute them, as applicable, in
accordance with s 57 of the Partnership Act.
19 The other orders sought and agreed, are also appropriate, including
that the receivers and managers be remunerated from the assets of the
Partnership on the basis proposed in the memorandum of consent
orders at the hourly rates annexed to the consent to act filed on 9 July
2026.
Orders
20 I will make orders substantially in terms of the memorandum of
consent orders filed on 20 July 2026.1
1 A copy of the orders made is attached in Annexure A.
-- 6 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
MASTER RUSSELL
Page 7
I certify that the preceding paragraph(s) comprise the reasons for decision of
the Supreme Court of Western Australia.
WVD
Associate to Master Russell
28 JULY 2026
-- 7 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
MASTER RUSSELL
Page 8
ANNEXURE A
ORDERS OF MASTER RUSSELL
MADE ON 28 JULY 2026
UPON THE APPLICATION of the plaintiffs by originating summons filed on
8 July 2026 (Application) AND the parties having recorded their consent in a
memorandum of consent orders filed on 20 July 2026 AND UPON HEARING
Mr D Butler for the plaintiffs and Mr K Tse for the defendants, IT IS
ORDERED THAT:
Dissolution of Partnership
1. The Axis Financial Group Partnership (ABN 73 192 340 906) (Partnership) be dissolved
pursuant to s 46(g) of the Partnership Act 1895 (WA) (Act), as from the date of this order.
Appointment of Receivers and Managers
2. The Court hereby appoints as Joint and Several Receivers and Managers of the Partnership,
Mr Jimmy Trpcevski and Mr Gregory Mathew Prout of WA Insolvency Solutions – a
division of Jirsch Sutherland of Suite 6.02, Level 6, 109 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000
(Receivers and Managers).
Powers of the Receivers and Managers
3. The Receivers and Managers have the powers to:
(a) get in, collect and receive all property of the Partnership;
(b) conduct any banking associated with the business of the Partnership and have
authority to operate the bank accounts operated by or on behalf of the Partnership;
(c) open any further bank accounts in the name of the Receivers and Managers to assist in
the management by the Receivers and Managers of the assets of the Partnership;
(d) apply the funds of the Partnership totalling $103,815.76 which are held in the trust
account of WA Insolvency Solutions – a division of Jirsch Sutherland (Partnership
Funds), for the purposes of giving effect to these orders, and specifically the
distributions contemplated by order 3(f) and the Receivers and Managers’
remuneration pursuant to order 4;
(e) and shall, prepare a statement giving an account of the distributions made in
accordance with order 3(f), and provide copies of such accounts to each of the former
partners that is a party to this proceeding (Former Partners) which shall stand as prima
facie accounts of the winding up of the Partnership, subject to the right of any Former
Partner (via its liquidator(s)) to apply to the Court within 21 days of receipt of copies
-- 8 of 9 --
[2026] WASC 303
MASTER RUSSELL
Page 9
of the accounts to object upon notice to the liquidator(s) of the other Former Partners;
(f) subject to any further order of the Court, thereafter, distribute the assets of the
Partnership in accordance with s 57 of the Act; and
(g) subject to any further order of the Court, pay the distributions to any Former Partner
under s 57 of the Act to that Former Partner’s liquidator(s), or their assignee or
nominee upon any Former Partner giving notice in writing to the Receivers and
Managers of the assignment or nomination.
Remuneration of Receivers and Managers
4. The Receivers and Managers be remunerated from the assets of the Partnership on a time
cost basis at the hourly rates annexed to the Consent to Act as Receivers and Managers filed
on 9 July 2026, and such claim for remuneration, any disbursements and GST is to be
submitted to the liquidator(s) of the Former Partners and, if demanded by any of the said
liquidators in writing within 14 days from the notification of the claim for remuneration,
submitted for approval by a Registrar of the Supreme Court, otherwise the Receivers and
Managers be authorised to draw the remuneration, disbursements and GST sought.
Liberty to Apply
5. The parties and the Receivers and Managers have liberty to apply in relation to orders 2 to 4
of these orders.
Costs
6. No order as to costs of the Application.
BY THE COURT
MASTER S RUSSELL
-- 9 of 9 --