Lake v Hermann (No 2) [2026] QSC 201

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Lake v Hermann (No 2) [2026] QSC 201 PARTIES: SLAVICA LAKE (applicant) v STUART GORDON HERMANN (first respondent) WENDY JANET HERMANN (second respondent) QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (third respondent) FILE NO/S: 656/26 DIVISION: Trial Division PROCEEDING: Application for Judicial Review ORIGINATING COURT: Supreme Court of Queensland at Brisbane DELIVERED ON: 28 August 2026 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 21 May 2026 (corrections to the applicant’s final submissions received 24 May 2026). JUDGE: McLeod J ORDER: 1. Pursuant to r 388(2) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) the order made on 21 August 2026 be corrected so that it reads: “Order: The amended application for review filed 5 March 2026 is dismissed.” 2. No order as to costs in respect to correcting the CATCHWORDS: SOLICITORS: order. PROCEDURE – SUPREME COURT PROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND – PROCEDURE UNDER UNIFORM CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 1999 (Qld) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 388 The applicant appeared on her own behalf Hall Payne Lawyers for the first and second respondents -- 1 of 2 -- [1] Judgment in this matter was delivered on 21 August 2026: Lake v Hermann [2026] QSC 193. [2] I made the following order, as set out in the written reasons for judgment: “The amended application for review filed 16 March 2026 is dismissed.” [3] By correspondence emailed 24 August 2026 to my associate, the solicitors for the first and second respondents advised the Court that they had identified a typographical error in respect to the order, namely, the amended application for review was actually filed on 5 March 2026, not 16 March 2026 as reflected in the order. The correspondence proceeded to inquire whether the Court would amend “the order under the slip rule, rule 288 (sic) in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules?” I note the applicant was copied into the correspondence forwarded to my associate. [4] The date referred to in the order is clearly a clerical mistake. Accordingly, the order will be corrected pursuant to r 388 (2) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) to provide: “The amended application for review filed 5 March 2026 is dismissed.” [5] There will be no order as to costs in respect to correcting the order. -- 2 of 2 --