Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
i
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
S.R. No. 142/1996
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Rule Page
1. Object 1
2. Authorising provisions 1
3. Commencement 1
4. Repeal and saving 1
5. New Chapter VIII 2
CHAPTER VIII 2
SUPREME COURT (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY)
RULES 1996 2
ORDER 1 2
PRELIMINARY 2
1.01 Application of these Rules 2
1.02 Application of Chapter I 2
1.03 Definitions 2
ORDER 2 5
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST 5
2.01 Judge to control List 5
2.02 Entry into Intellectual Property List 6
2.03 Removal from List 6
2.04 Summons for directions 6
2.05 Reference in pleadings to published document 8
ORDER 3 8
ATTENDANCE BY COMMISSIONER 8
3.01 Attendance by the Commissioner 8
ORDER 4 9
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PATENTS ACT 9
4.01 Application 9
4.02 Application for amendment of a patent 9
4.03 Particulars of infringement 11
4.04 Grounds of invalidity 11
4.05 Compulsory licences and revocation of patents 13
-- 1 of 27 --
Rule Page
ii
ORDER 5 14
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT 14
5.01 Application 14
5.02 Particulars of infringement 14
5.03 Grounds of invalidity 14
ORDER 6 15
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE DESIGNS ACT 15
6.01 Application 15
6.02 Particulars of infringement 15
6.03 Grounds of invalidity etc. 15
6.04 Compulsory licences 17
ORDER 7 17
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT 17
7.01 Application 17
7.02 Particulars of infringement 18
ORDER 8 18
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE CIRCUIT LAYOUTS ACT 18
8.01 Application 18
8.02 Particulars of infringement 18
ORDER 9 19
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE OLYMPIC INSIGNIA
PROTECTION ACT 19
9.01 Application 19
9.02 Particulars of infringement 19
9.03 Grounds of invalidity 19
ORDER 10 21
APPOINTMENT OF A COURT EXPERT 21
10.01 Court expert 21
10.02 Report by Court expert 21
10.03 Cross-examination of Court expert on report 22
10.04 Conduct of experiment or test 22
10.05 Further report 22
10.06 Remuneration of expert 23
═══════════════
NOTES 24
-- 2 of 27 --
1
STATUTORY RULES 1996
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court Act 1986
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
The Judges of the Supreme Court make the following Rules:
1. Object
The object of these Rules is to provide a new
Chapter VIII of the Rules of the Supreme Court for
proceedings in relation to intellectual property.
2. Authorising provisions
These Rules are made under section 25 of the
Supreme Court Act 1986 and all other enabling
powers.
3. Commencement
These Rules come into operation on 3 February
1997.
4. Repeal and saving
(1) Chapter VIII of the Rules of the Supreme Court,
the Supreme Court Industrial Property Rules
19921 , is revoked.
(2) Chapter VIII of the Rules of the Supreme Court as
in force immediately before the commencement of
these Rules shall continue to apply to a
proceeding in the Court commenced before the
commencement of these Rules as if these Rules
had not been made.
-- 3 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
2
5. New Chapter VIII
The following Rules constitute Chapter VIII of
the Rules of the Supreme Court
'CHAPTER VIII
SUPREME COURT (INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY) RULES 1996
ORDER 1
PRELIMINARY
1.01 Application of these Rules
These Rules apply to any intellectual
property case commenced in the Court on or
after 3 February 1997 and to an application
made under Rule 2.02 to enter a proceeding
in the List and to a proceeding so entered.
1.02 Application of Chapter I
Chapter I of the Rules of the Supreme Court
and the general practice of the Court apply in
relation to a proceeding to which these Rules
apply except so far as is otherwise provided
by these Rules or any Act or regulations
made under any Act.
1.03 Definitions
(1) In these Rules —
"Advance Australia Logo Protection Act"
means the Advance Australia Logo
Protection Act 1984 of the
Commonwealth;
r. 5
-- 4 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
3
"Circuit Layouts Act" means the Circuit
Layouts Act 1989 of the
Commonwealth;
"Commissioner" means—
(a) in relation to proceedings under
the Patents Act—the
Commissioner under that Act; and
(b) in relation to proceedings under
the Designs Act—the Registrar
under that Act; and
(c) in relation to proceedings under
the Trade Marks Act—the
Registrar under that Act; and
(d) in relation to proceedings under
the Olympic Insignia Protection
Act—the Registrar under the
Designs Act.
"Copyright Act" means the Copyright Act
1968 of the Commonwealth;
"court expert" is a person who has been
appointed as an independent expert
under Rule 10.01(1);
"decision" includes a direction given or
determination made by the
Commissioner or Secretary;
"Designs Act" means the Designs Act 1906
of the Commonwealth;
"expert" includes any skilled person whose
opinion on a question relevant to any
issue in dispute in a proceeding would
be received by the Court;
r. 5
-- 5 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
4
"intellectual property case" means—
(a) a proceeding for the infringement,
or the determination of the
validity of
(i) a patent granted under the
Patents Act or the Patents
Act 1952 of the
Commonwealth;
(ii) a trade mark registered under
the Trade Marks Act;
(iii) a design registered under the
Designs Act;
(iv) EL rights allegedly
subsisting under the Circuit
Layouts Act;
(v) the design of a logo provided
for by the Advance Australia
Logo Protection Act;
(vi) a protected design provided
for by the Olympic Insignia
Protection Act; or
(vii) copyright allegedly
subsisting under the
Copyright Act;
(b) an application, appeal or other
proceeding under a subject Act,
whether or not joined with any
other claim or cause of action.
"List" means the Intellectual Property List
compiled by the Prothonotary;
"Olympic Insignia Protection Act" means
the Olympic Insignia Protection Act
1987 of the Commonwealth;
r. 5
-- 6 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
5
"Patents Act" means the Patents Act 1990
of the Commonwealth;
"Secretary" means the Secretary referred to
in the Patents Act;
"subject Act" means the Advance Australia
Logo Protection Act, the Circuit
Layouts Act, the Copyright Act, the
Designs Act, the Olympic Insignia
Protection Act, the Patents Act or the
Trade Marks Act, as the case requires;
"Trade Marks Act" means the Trade
Marks Act 1995 of the Commonwealth;
(2) An expression used in these Rules that is
also used in a provision of a subject Act
under which, or in relation to which, a
proceeding is taken has, for the purposes of
that proceeding, the same meaning in these
Rules as it has in that provision.
ORDER 2
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIST
2.01 Judge to control List
(1) A Judge shall be in charge and shall have
control of the proceedings in the List.
(2) The powers of the Court in relation to a
proceeding in the List shall, subject to any
directions of the Judge and to paragraph (3),
be exercised only by the Judge.
(3) The powers of the Judge in relation to a
proceeding in the List may be exercised by
another Judge if the Judge requests him to do
so or if in special circumstances that other
Judge thinks fit to exercise them.
r. 5
-- 7 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
6
2.02 Entry into Intellectual Property List
(1) The writ, originating motion, summons, or
other document commencing an intellectual
property case may at the option of the
plaintiff be marked with the words
"Intellectual Property List" and, upon the
filing of a document so marked, shall be
entered in the List.
(2) A party to an intellectual property case in
which the document commencing it has not
been marked in accordance with paragraph
(1) may within 14 days after appearance
apply to the Judge for an order entering the
case in the List and the Judge shall make an
order entering the case in the List unless
satisfied that there are good reasons for not
making such an order.
(3) In any other proceeding any party or the
Commissioner may apply to the Judge for an
order entering the proceeding in the List and
the Judge may make an order entering the
proceeding in the List if satisfied that there
are good reasons for making such an order.
2.03 Removal from List
The Judge may at any time order that a case
in the List be removed from the List.
2.04 Summons for directions
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), and unless the
Judge otherwise orders, the party first-named
in a proceeding in the List shall as soon as
practicable after commencement of the
proceeding file and serve upon each
defendant a summons for directions.
(2) A summons for directions shall not be filed
in a proceeding or served as provided in
r. 5
-- 8 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
7
paragraph (1) until after an appearance has
been filed by a defendant.
(3) On the hearing of the summons for directions
the Judge may give such directions with
respect to the conduct of the proceeding as
the Judge thinks fit.
(4) Without limiting paragraph (3), the Judge
may make orders with respect to
(a) the defining of the issues by pleadings
or otherwise;
(b) any amendment of pleadings;
(c) any counterclaim;
(d) particulars;
(e) discovery and inspection of documents;
(f) admissions of fact or of documents;
(g) the joinder of parties;
(h) the mode and sufficiency of service;
(i) interrogatories;
(j) the inspection of any property or thing;
(k) the filing and service of affidavits;
(l) the disclosure of reports of experts;
(m) the filing and exchange of signed
statements of evidence of intended
witnesses and their use in evidence at
the hearing;
(n) the making of any experiment, test, or
report;
(o) the appointment of a Court expert under
Order 10 of these Rules;
(p) defining and limiting the issues to be
tried, restricting the number of
r. 5
-- 9 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
8
witnesses and otherwise ensuring that
the case is disposed of expeditiously;
(q) documents prepared by the parties;
(r) the place, time and mode of hearing;
(s) the giving of evidence at the hearing,
including whether evidence in chief of
witnesses shall be given orally or by
affidavit or affirmation;
(t) costs.
2.05 Reference in pleadings to published
document
Where a party refers in a pleading to any
published document (including a book) that
party shall after the pleading is served make
available to any other party to the proceeding
who so requests a copy of each such
published document or part thereof on which
that party relies.
ORDER 3
ATTENDANCE BY COMMISSIONER
3.01 Attendance by the Commissioner
The Commissioner may attend and be heard
in any intellectual property case, but is not a
party to the case unless the Judge otherwise
orders.
r. 5
-- 10 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
9
ORDER 4
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PATENTS
ACT
4.01 Application
This Order applies to proceedings under the
Patents Act other than an appeal from a
decision of the Commissioner.
4.02 Application for amendment of a patent
(1) An application for an order under section
105(1) of the Patents Act may be made only
after the plaintiff has given to the
Commissioner a notice of intention to apply
for the order.
(2) The Judge may give directions with respect
to the publication by the plaintiff of an
advertisement that states—
(a) the identity of the proceeding in which
an application under section 105(1) of
the Patents Act will be made;
(b) the particulars of the amendment
sought;
(c) the plaintiff's address for service; and
(d) the requirement that a person intending
to oppose the application who is not a
party to the proceeding shall, not later
than 28 days after publication of the
advertisement, give written notice of
that intention to the Commissioner and
to the persons who are parties to the
proceeding.
(3) If the Judge orders the publication of an
advertisement under section 5(2) of the
r. 5
-- 11 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
10
Patents Act, the Commissioner shall publish
the advertisement in the Official Journal
once, unless the Judge otherwise orders.
(4) A person who gives notice under paragraph
(2)(d) is entitled to be heard in opposition to
the application, subject to any direction of
the Judge as to costs.
(5) The application may be instituted by filing a
summons in the relevant proceeding.
(6) A copy of the summons, together with a
copy of the patent, patent request or
complete specification, as appropriate,
showing in ink of contrasting colour the
amendment sought, shall be served on the
Commissioner, each party to the proceeding
and each person who has given notice under
paragraph (2)(d).
(7) On the hearing of the summons, the Judge
may give any direction he thinks fit for the
conduct of the proceeding, including a
direction—
(a) requiring the applicant to give to each
party or other person who opposes the
application a statement of the grounds
relied on for the amendment;
(b) requiring a party or other person
opposing the application to give to the
applicant a statement of the grounds
relied on in opposition to the
amendment;
(c) determining that the summons will be
heard at trial with the relevant
proceeding or separately and, if
separately, fixing the date for hearing
the summons;
r. 5
-- 12 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
11
(d) determining the manner in which
evidence will be given and, in the case
of evidence by affidavit, fixing the
times within which the affidavits shall
be filed and served.
4.03 Particulars of infringement
(1) In an infringement proceeding under section
120(1) of the Patents Act, a copy of the writ
and any statement of claim shall be served
on each defendant and the Commissioner,
and, if the applicant is an exclusive licensee,
the patentee.
(2) Particulars of the infringements complained
of shall give at least one instance of each
type of infringement alleged and shall
specify which of the claims of the complete
specification of the patent are alleged to have
been infringed.
(3) A defendant who seeks to rely on a defence
under section 144(4) of the Patents Act shall
give particulars of
(a) the date of, and the parties to, any
contract on which the defendant intends
to rely for the defence; and
(b) the provision of the contract that the
defendant alleges is void.
4.04 Grounds of invalidity
(1) A party who disputes the validity of a patent
shall by the pleading in which the party
disputes such validity, set out the grounds of
invalidity on which that party relies and the
material facts relied on in support of each
ground.
(2) If a ground relied on is based on information
contained in a document or arises through
r. 5
-- 13 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
12
the doing of an act, the pleading shall
specify
(a) in the case of a document
(i) the time when, and the place
where, the document is alleged to
have become publicly available;
and
(ii) whether the whole or some part
and if so which part of the
document is relied on;
(b) in the case of an act
(i) the name of the person alleged to
have done the act;
(ii) the period in which, and the place
where, the act is alleged to have
been done;
(iii) a description that is sufficient to
identify the act; and
(iv) if the act relates to an article,
apparatus or machinery, whether
the article, apparatus or machinery
exists and, if so, where it can be
inspected.
(3) If
(a) one of the grounds of invalidity relied
on is that the invention so far as
claimed in any claim of the complete
specification of the patent is not useful;
and
(b) it is intended, in connection with that
ground, to rely on the fact that an
example of the invention which is the
subject of any such claim cannot be
r. 5
-- 14 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
13
made to work, either at all or as
described in the specification
the pleading shall identify each such claim
and state that fact and must identify each
such example, specifying the respect in
which it is alleged that it does not work as
described.
(4) Any party served with a pleading as
provided by paragraph (1) shall, unless the
Judge otherwise orders, file and serve on
each other party to the proceeding an answer
thereto.
(5) Except by leave of the Judge, evidence is not
admissible in proof of a ground of invalidity
in relation to which the requirements of
paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) have not been
satisfied.
4.05 Compulsory licences and revocation of
patents
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of these
Rules or of Chapter I of the Rules of the
Supreme Court, an application under section
133(1), 134(1) or 138(1) of the Patents Act
and any statement of claim, originating
motion, summons or affidavit in support
shall be served
(a) on the patentee; and
(b) as a further defendant, on any person
who claims an interest in the patent as
exclusive licensee.
(2) Any statement of claim, originating motion,
summons or affidavit in support referred to
in this Order shall comply with Chapter 12
of the Patents Regulations 1991 of the
Commonwealth.
r. 5
-- 15 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
14
(3) An application for leave under section
137(4) of the Patents Act may be made by
summons in the proceeding.
ORDER 5
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE TRADE
MARKS ACT
5.01 Application
This Order applies to proceedings under the
Trade Marks Act other than an appeal from a
decision of the Commissioner.
5.02 Particulars of infringement
In a proceeding for infringement of a
registered trade mark particulars of the
infringement shall
(a) specify the manner in which the trade
mark is alleged to have been infringed;
and
(b) give at least one instance of each type
of infringement alleged.
5.03 Grounds of invalidity
(1) A party who disputes the validity of the
registration of a registered trade mark shall
by the pleading or in which the party
disputes such validity, set out the grounds of
invalidity on which that party relies and the
material facts relied on in support of each
ground.
(2) Any party served with a pleading as
provided by paragraph (1) shall, unless the
Judge otherwise orders, file and serve on
each other party to the proceeding an answer
thereto.
r. 5
-- 16 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
15
(3) Except by leave of the Judge, evidence is not
admissible in proof of a ground of invalidity
in relation to which the requirements of
paragraph (1) have not been satisfied.
ORDER 6
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE DESIGNS
ACT
6.01 Application
This Order applies to proceedings under the
Designs Act other than an appeal from a
decision of the Commissioner.
6.02 Particulars of infringement
In a proceeding for the infringement of a
registered design particulars of the
infringement shall specify the manner in
which the design is alleged to have been
infringed and shall give at least one instance
of each type of infringement alleged.
6.03 Grounds of invalidity etc.
(1) A party who
(a) applies under section 28(a) of the
Designs Act for the cancellation of the
registration of a design; or
(b) applies under section 32 or 39 of the
Designs Act for rectification of the
Register; or
r. 5
-- 17 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
16
(c) disputes the validity of a registered
design
shall by the pleading in which the party
makes that application or disputes such
validity, set out the grounds for cancellation
or rectification or of invalidity on which that
party relies and the material facts relied on in
support of each ground.
(2) If a ground relied on is based on information
contained in a document or arises through
the doing of an act, the pleading shall
specify
(a) in the case of a document
(i) the time when, and the place
where, the document is alleged to
have become publicly available;
and
(ii) whether the whole or some part of
it and if so which part of the
document is relied on;
(b) in the case of an act—
(i) the name of the person alleged to
have done the act;
(ii) the period in which, and the place
where, the act is alleged to have
been done;
(iii) a description that is sufficient to
identify the act; and
(iv) if the act relates to an article,
apparatus or machinery, whether
the article, apparatus or machinery
exists and, if so, where it can be
inspected.
r. 5
-- 18 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
17
(3) Any party served with a pleading as
provided by paragraph (1) shall, unless
the Judge otherwise orders, file and
serve on each other party to the
proceeding an answer thereto.
(4) Except by leave of the Judge, evidence
is not admissible if proof of a ground
for cancellation or rectification or of
invalidity of which particulars have not
been given.
6.04 Compulsory licences
In a proceeding for the grant of a compulsory
licence under section 28(b) of the Designs
Act particulars of the application shall
(a) specify the article to which it is alleged
the design is applied by manufacture
outside the Commonwealth;
(b) specify the country of manufacture of
the article;
(c) state the acts, facts and circumstances
intended to be relied on to show that
the design is not so applied in the
Commonwealth to such an extent as is
reasonable in the circumstances of the
case.
ORDER 7
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE COPYRIGHT
ACT
7.01 Application
This Order applies to proceedings under the
Copyright Act.
r. 5
-- 19 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
18
7.02 Particulars of infringement
In a proceeding for infringement of
copyright particulars of the infringement
shall
(a) specify the manner in which the
copyright is alleged to have been
infringed;
(b) give at least one instance of each type
of infringement alleged; and
(c) specify whether the whole or some part
and if so which part of the work or
other subject matter is alleged to have
been infringed.
ORDER 8
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE CIRCUIT
LAYOUTS ACT
8.01 Application
This Order applies to proceedings under the
Circuit Layouts Act.
8.02 Particulars of infringement
In a proceeding for infringement of EL rights
particulars of the infringement shall
(a) specify the manner in which it is
alleged the EL rights have been
infringed, and
(b) give at least one instance of each type
of infringement alleged.
r. 5
-- 20 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
19
ORDER 9
PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE OLYMPIC
INSIGNIA PROTECTION ACT
9.01 Application
This Order applies to proceedings under the
Olympic Insignia Protection Act other than
an appeal from a decision of the
Commissioner.
9.02 Particulars of infringement
In a proceeding for infringement of the
monopoly in a protected design particulars of
the infringement shall
(a) specify the manner in which the design
is alleged to have been infringed; and
(b) give at least one instance of each type
of infringement alleged.
9.03 Grounds of invalidity
(1) A party who
(a) applies under section 12(9) of the
Olympic Insignia Protection Act for the
rectification of the register; or
(b) disputes the validity of a protected
design under the Olympic Insignia
Protection Act—
shall, by the pleading in which the party
makes that application or disputes such
validity, set out the grounds for rectification
or of invalidity on which that party relies and
the material facts relied on in support of each
ground.
r. 5
-- 21 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
20
(2) If a ground relied on is based on information
contained in a document or arises through
the doing of an act, the pleading shall
specify
(a) in the case of a document—
(i) the time when, and the place
where, the document is alleged to
have become publicly available;
and
(ii) whether the whole or some part
and if so which part of the
document is relied on;
(b) in the case of an act
(i) the name of the person alleged to
have done the act;
(ii) the period in which, and the place
where, the act is alleged to have
been done;
(iii) a description that is sufficient to
identify the act; and
(iv) if the act relates to an article,
apparatus or machinery, whether
the article, apparatus or machinery
exists and, if so, where it can be
inspected.
(3) Any party served with a pleading as
provided by paragraph (1) shall, unless the
Judge otherwise orders, file and serve on
each other party to the proceeding an answer
thereto.
(4) Except by leave of the Judge, evidence is not
admissible in proof of a ground for
rectification or of invalidity in relation to
r. 5
-- 22 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
21
which the requirements of paragraphs (1)
and (2) have not been satisfied.
ORDER 10
APPOINTMENT OF A COURT EXPERT
10.01 Court expert
(1) In any proceeding in the List which in the
opinion of the Judge involves a question for
an expert witness, the Judge may at any time
on the application of a party or on his own
motion appoint an independent expert to
inquire into and report on a question of fact
or of opinion (not involving questions of law
or construction) or to provide a
demonstration for the Court.
(2) The Judge may appoint Court experts in
respect of different subject matters and this
Order applies to each such appointment.
(3) A Court expert shall be a person agreed
between the parties but, failing agreement,
shall be nominated by the Judge.
(4) The question or the instruction submitted or
given to the Court expert, failing agreement
between the parties, shall be settled by the
Judge.
10.02 Report by Court expert
(1) A report by a Court expert shall be made in
writing to the Court and shall, together with
such copies as the Judge directs, be provided
to the Judge.
(2) A copy of the report shall be forwarded by
the Prothonotary to each party.
r. 5
-- 23 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
22
(3) Any report made by a Court expert shall,
insofar as it is not accepted by all parties, be
treated as information furnished to the Court
and shall be given such weight as the Court
thinks fit.
10.03 Cross-examination of Court expert on
report
(1) A party may, within 14 days after receipt of
a copy of the report or within such further
time as the Judge directs, apply for leave to
cross-examine the Court expert on his report.
(2) The Judge may, on an application under
paragraph (1), make an order for cross-
examination of the Court expert
(a) at the trial; or
(b) before such person and at such time and
place as the Judge directs.
10.04 Conduct of experiment or test
(1) If the Court expert is of the opinion that an
experiment or test (other than an experiment
or test of a trifling character) is necessary to
enable him to report in a satisfactory manner,
he shall inform the parties and shall, if
possible, make an arrangement with them as
to the expenses involved, the persons to
attend and other relevant matters.
(2) If the parties are unable to agree on any
matter, that matter shall be settled by the
Judge.
10.05 Further report
The Judge may at any time direct a Court
expert to make a further or supplementary
report.
r. 5
-- 24 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
23
10.06 Remuneration of expert
(1) The remuneration of a Court expert shall be
fixed by the Judge and shall include
(a) a fee for making the report and a fee for
any further or supplementary report
(including the cost of an experiment or
test under Rule 10.04 where the parties
are unable to agree on the fee); and
(b) a fee for each day on which the
presence of the Court expert is required
either in Court or before such person as
is referred to in Rule 10.03(2)(b).
(2) The parties shall be jointly and severally
liable to pay the remuneration so fixed
without prejudice to the question by whom it
shall be ordered to be paid as part of the
costs of the proceeding.
(3) The Judge may require any party to give
security for the remuneration of the Court
expert.'.
Dated: 28 November 1996
J. H. PHILLIPS, C.J.
JOHN WINNEKE, P.
ROBERT BROOKING, J.A.
R. C. TADGELL, J.A.
W. F. ORMISTON, J.A.
JOHN D. PHILLIPS, J.A.
K. M. HAYNE, J.A.
STEPHEN CHARLES, J.A.
F. H. CALLAWAY, J.A.
G. HAMPEL, J.
r. 5
-- 25 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
24
H. NATHAN, J.
BERNARD G. TEAGUE, J.
ALLAN W. McDONALD, J.
T. H. SMITH, J.
JOHN J. HEDIGAN, J.
DAVID BYRNE, J.
D. L. HARPER, J.
G. M. EAMES, J.
J. M. BATT, J.
H. R. HANSEN, J.
ROSEMARY BALMFORD, J.
═══════════════
r. 5
-- 26 of 27 --
S.R. No. 142/1996
Supreme Court (Intellectual Property) Rules 1996
25
NOTES
1 S.R. No. 213/1992.
Notes
-- 27 of 27 --